Skip to content
Resources/Weekly Insights
Subscribe
Volume 15, Edition 12 | April 20 - April 26, 2026

Private Credit Under the Microscope

Doug Walters, CFA
The pitch for private credit was high yields with low volatility… tempting, but increasingly misleading as scrutiny intensifies. We share nine facts that explain why we have steered our clients clear of the asset class from the start.

Contributed by Doug Walters, David Lemire, Max Berkovich, Matthew Johnson

With so much geopolitical uncertainty, the biggest surprise this past week may be how sanguine equity markets have been. We use this lull to dive deeper into private credit, where pressure continues.

First, let me say that private credit isn’t inherently bad. Lending to companies that can’t access public markets is a noble venture. But it has become a cautionary tale for the average investor, who is increasingly the preferred target of private credit managers. The promise is high yields with low volatility… tempting, yet misleading. From the beginning, the lure was easy for us to avoid: an asset class with the credit profile of junk bonds, limited liquidity, light oversight, and high fees threw up too many red flags.

Now as increased public scrutiny pulls back the covers, we get a full picture of what “high yield and low volatility” really looks like. This is what catches our eye.

1. The credit quality is closer to junk than most investors realize

Roughly 90% of private credit loans are rated single-B or lower on a ratings-implied basis, vs about 40% in today’s high-yield bond market1. Borrowers are typically mid-sized companies owned by private equity firms, more leveraged and operating in narrower niches than public-market borrowers. The high yields are real, but they reflect the credit profile.

2. Roughly 40% cannot cover their expenses with cash flow

Per the IMF, the share of private credit borrowers not generating enough cash to cover expenses has climbed from 25% in 2021 to about 40% today2. That is one reason “payment-in-kind” loans have become so common.

3. PIK lets borrowers pay interest with more debt

Under a PIK (“payment-in-kind”) arrangement, a borrower pays interest by adding to the loan balance rather than writing a check. Some PIKs are structured at origination for fast-growing companies. The bigger issue is when a borrower switches mid-loan because it can no longer pay in cash. Distress PIK has roughly tripled since 20223.

4. Most private credit loans lack common bond safeguards

Covenant protections have eroded. Fewer than 10% of private credit deals over $500 million now include meaningful maintenance covenants, removing a key early-warning system that gave lenders time to intervene4.

5. Fraud is starting to surface under light regulation

Two recent blow-ups, auto parts maker First Brands and subprime auto lender Tricolor, involved allegations that borrowers pledged the same collateral to multiple lenders. BlackRock’s HPS unit separately lent hundreds of millions against receivables that appear fake. As JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon put it: when you see one cockroach, there are probably more.

6. The claimed “low volatility” is an illusion

Private loans don’t trade publicly and aren’t marked-to-market like a bond fund. A loan that would be down 15% if it traded daily can sit at par for months. Smooth returns on paper are not low risk; they are the absence of pricing.

7. Sector concentration is higher than in a typical bond fund

Software loans make up roughly 21% of the typical private credit portfolio, with that number rising to about 40% for the rest of Tech and Business Services5. A high-yield bond fund, by contrast, is usually spread across a dozen or more industries with no single sector exceeding 15%.

8. Investors may not be able to get out when they want

Most retail private credit vehicles cap quarterly redemptions at roughly 5%. Funds run by Apollo, Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, and Ares have all hit those caps in recent quarters, returning only a fraction of what investors asked for. Blue Owl went further, permanently halting redemptions on one of its funds this year.

9. Insurance companies hold nearly $1 trillion of private credit

Individual investors aren’t the only ones pressured into private credit. Life insurers, many now owned or managed by the same private equity firms running the credit funds, have built up close to $1 trillion on behalf of their annuity holders6.

We have seen a pattern like this before. The 1980s junk bond market followed a similar arc: high yields, low reported defaults, aggressive marketing. Default rates ran between 1% and 4% through most of the decade before climbing above 10% in 1990-91, and junk bonds posted losses that erased much of the prior decade’s gains.

We don’t know how private credit ends, but a new credit market growing rapidly in a benign environment and marketed to individuals late in the cycle is not an unfamiliar pattern. We are happy to have guided our clients clear of this asset class. It wasn’t prescient, it was just following the evidence.

1. Verdad Advisers, The Reflexivity of Credit Markets (Apr 2026).
2. International Monetary Fund, Global Financial Stability Report, Apr 2025.
3. Lincoln International, Senior Debt Quarterly Report, Q3 2025.
4. Resonanz Capital, Covenant-Lite to Covenant-void? navigating Private Credit Risk (May 28, 2025).
5. JPMorgan, Private Credit Under the Microscope – Separating Headlines from Fundamentals (Mar 12, 2026).
6. The Wall Street Journal, Insurers’ $1 Trillion Buildup in Private Credit Is Leaving Regulators in the Dust (Apr 7, 2026).

And I probably shouldn’t say this, but when you see one cockroach, there are probably more. And so we should—everyone should be forewarned on this one.

Jamie Dimon – CEO, JPMorgan

Headline of the Week

When the Process Becomes the Story

Late last week, the Department of Justice formally ended its criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, transferring scrutiny of the Fed’s headquarters renovation to the central bank’s Inspector General. The decision closed off the immediate prospect of charges and, more importantly, removed the procedural barrier that had stalled the confirmation of Powell’s likely successor, Kevin Warsh.

While the DOJ technically retained the option to revisit the matter if new evidence emerges, the episode was never only about construction costs. The investigation had become a proxy battle over institutional boundaries. It seemed to test how far legal authority could be used to apply pressure on the central bank during a challenging rate environment.

Senator Thom Tillis lifted his blockade, effectively clearing the path for Warsh’s confirmation as Powell’s term ends in mid‑May. Warsh has emphasized continuity and independence in his confirmation testimony, though markets remain focused less on rhetoric than on how the Fed navigates inflation, energy shocks, and political scrutiny in the months ahead.

For investors, the key takeaway is not a change in near‑term policy expectations, but a reminder that institutional resilience is increasingly part of the story. When process dominates headlines, it often signals that confidence in rules, roles, and restraint, is being tested rather than quietly assumed.

The Week Ahead

It feels like everything hits in the same week. What a way to exit April. A handful of major central banks face rate decisions, an inflation report, and five of seven Mega’s report results.

Farewell Party

On its own, a week with rate decisions from the Federal Reserve (Fed), European Central Bank (ECB), Bank of England (BoE), Bank of Japan (BoJ), and Bank of Canada (BoC) would be a big week, but we have more to chew on.

  • No rate moves are expected from the ECB, but the tone of future moves discussion may be impacted by preliminary first quarter Gross Domestic Product (GDP) report and ever-rising energy prices.
  • In the United Kingdom, inflation has not accelerated sizably, and retail sales have impressed. Which way they go can tilt next week, but no move is in the lead right now for the BoE.
  • Consensus says a BoJ rate hike is off the table; however, some form of intervention on behalf of the Yen may be brewing.
  • Canada is not expected to change its policy rate at this meeting, with rates already down to 2.25% from 5% in 2024.
  • The Fed is not expected to move rates either, but all the focus will be on the changing of the guard.
  • This is expected to be the last meeting with Chairman Powell at the helm, with Kevin Warsh taking over.
  • There are no dot plots at this meeting, the GDP number out Wednesday is backward looking, and the Inflation report (personal consumption expenditures) is released after the meeting, taking some oomph out.

Mag-nificent

This is the biggest week for earnings, with Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta reporting on Wednesday night and Apple reporting on Thursday.

  • These will be lost in the tech headlines, but Visa, Mastercard, Coca-Cola, Colgate-Palmolive, Eli Lilly, Merck, Caterpillar, Berkshire Hathaway, ExxonMobil, and Chevron are also on the schedule.
  • The Mag 4 collectively represents over $12.6 trillion in market capitalization, which is almost 17% of the total U.S. stock market. The other companies singled out above collectively, adding up to about $6.4 trillion. Wow!
  • The new CEO of Apple, John Ternus, does not take over until September, but the changing of the guard in Cupertino will be a hot topic on Thursday.

About Strategic

Founded in 1979, Strategic is a leading investment and wealth management firm managing and advising on total client assets of over $2.5 billion.

Overview

Disclosures

Strategic Financial Services, Inc. is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an Investment Advisor. The term “registered” signifies compliance with regulatory requirements and does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

The information provided on our website, including weekly market commentaries, financial planning articles, and other educational resources, is intended solely for educational purposes. It is designed to offer insights into financial planning and investment management, aiming to enhance understanding of financial concepts, strategies, and market trends. This content should not be interpreted as personalized investment advice or a recommendation for any specific strategy, financial planning approach, or investment product. Financial decisions are deeply personal and should be made considering the individual’s specific circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance. We recommend consulting with a professional financial advisor for personalized advice.

Please be aware that Strategic Financial Services, Inc. does not provide legal or tax advice. The content on this website is not intended to be used as such or as a substitute for legal or tax advice from a licensed professional. We advise seeking guidance from qualified legal and tax advisors regarding these matters.
Investment Risks and Portfolio Management.

The discussion of any investments on this website is for illustrative purposes only and provides no guarantee that the advisor will make any investments with the same or similar characteristics as those presented. The investments identified and described herein do not represent all the investments purchased or sold for client accounts. The selection of representative investments to discuss is based on various factors, including recent company news or earnings releases.

It should not be assumed that any investments discussed were or will be profitable. All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal. There is no assurance that investments mentioned will remain in client accounts at the time you view this information.

When index returns are mentioned on this site, they are provided as a general indicator of market conditions and are not representative of any client’s portfolio performance. Indices are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly. Therefore, their performance does not reflect the expenses associated with the management of an actual portfolio.

While index returns are used as a framework to report on general market conditions, they should not be construed as an indicator of future performance of any specific investment or portfolio. Discussion of index returns is intended to provide context and insight, not to suggest that clients will achieve similar results. Each client’s portfolio is managed according to their specific investment goals and financial situation.

The opinions and any forward-looking statements expressed in the articles and videos featured in our resource center are as of the date of publication. These statements are based on current laws, regulations, market conditions, and other relevant factors, including third-party data. Given the dynamic nature of financial and regulatory environments, as well as potential changes in market conditions or economic circumstances, the information provided may become outdated or may no longer be accurate.
We rely on third-party data to form our opinions and projections, which means that these are subject to the same uncertainties that affect all data-dependent analyses. As such, we advise readers to exercise caution and not rely solely on the statements made herein for making financial decisions. It is recommended that investors consult with a professional advisor who can help assess the relevance and accuracy of the content in light of the current economic climate and personal financial situation.

Our website contains links to third-party websites as a convenience to our users. Strategic Financial Services, Inc. does not control, endorse, or guarantee the content found on such sites. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of the external site or for that of subsequent links.
Contact the external site for answers to questions regarding its content.
The inclusion of any link does not imply our endorsement of the site, nor does it imply any association with its operators. Use of any such linked website is at the user’s own risk.

Related Resources