Skip to content
Resources/Weekly Insights
Subscribe
Volume 15, Edition 4 | February 2 - February 8, 2026

The Other (More Important) Market Risk

Doug Walters, CFA
Our latest Insights explains why the most important risk in investing isn’t volatility—it’s the potential for permanent loss of capital. We contrast the durability of Quality and Value–driven investments with the uncertain recoverability of assets like cryptocurrencies.

Contributed by Doug Walters, David Lemire, Max Berkovich, Matthew Johnson

Volatility gets most of the attention in investing, but it’s not the risk that matters most, in my opinion. The one that shapes long‑term outcomes and distinguishes prudent investing from speculation is permanent loss of capital. The phrase sounds straightforward, yet it’s not well understood.

What we are talking about is the difference between an asset that can recover and one that may never recover. It’s the dividing line between disciplined investing and largely avoidable damage. So, let’s dig in.

Consider Quality and Value

Two of the most durable investment factors, Quality and Value, work especially well when considered together. Value helps ensure investors are buying companies at prices that reflect, or even understate, their intrinsic worth. Quality helps ensure that those companies possess the financial strength, operational resilience, and balance‑sheet discipline needed to protect that intrinsic value over time.

Even when markets temporarily misprice companies that exhibit both Quality and Value characteristics, the underlying fundamentals continue to operate. Cash flows accumulate. Balance sheets remain sound. Competitive advantages persist. Management teams continue to reinvest, innovate, and adapt. Over time, these fundamentals tend to draw market prices back toward fair value.

In short, the risk of permanent loss of capital is diminished.

The Cryptocurrency Counterpoint

It’s too easy to pick on cryptocurrencies this week. But we will anyway. Bitcoin, the bellwether digital currency, had fallen about 50% from its 2025 peak as of last week. Unlike stocks that possess Quality and Value, cryptos typically do not have earnings, cash flows, or a balance sheet that can support valuation. Their worth depends almost entirely on future adoption and the collective belief that others will continue to ascribe value to them.

In other words, the risk of permanent loss of capital is high.

The underlying blockchain technology may offer utility in areas such as decentralized settlement, digital ownership, or global transfers, but Bitcoin is not a good currency. For something to function as a currency, it should be a stable store of value and an effective medium of exchange. The consistent high volatility is evidence enough for us that Bitcoin fails that test.

If we were to attempt to calculate an underlying value for Bitcoin, we’d have to delve into its utility as a medium of exchange for illicit transactions such as money laundering, ransomware payments, black market commerce, scams, fraud, terrorism financing, etc. It’s very good at that, but if that is where its value is derived, we want no part of it.

The Takeaway

The lesson is not that stocks are “good” and crypto is “bad.” It is that recoverability matters. When we build our evidence-based diversified portfolios, we are less concerned about volatility, which is often rewarded in the market, and more concerned about avoiding the potential for permanent loss of capital. In a market crash, it is the difference between a portfolio built to rebound and one that will never fully recover.

88%

Rebound of biotech (XBI) from its 52 week low

We talk above about avoiding permanent loss of capital. Biotech is an interesting case. We like exposure to an equal weight basket of biotech stocks like can be found in the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). We know many of those biotech stocks in the ETF will suffer permanent loss of capital when their R&D falls short. But the basket as a whole has historically provided attractive positive returns. Safety in numbers.

Headline of the Week

Labor Market Signals Flash Warning Amid Shutdown‑Delayed Data

A new week but similar issues persist. February’s start offered a reminder that economic narratives often hinge as much on what we can’t see as what we can. Another government shutdown (even if it was “partial”) delayed the January jobs report, leaving policymakers and markets without one of their most relied‑upon indicators. Since “nature hates a vacuum”, alternative measures are filling the void and are pointing to a labor market that may be losing a bit of its footing.

Layoff announcements climbed sharply to start the year, and high‑frequency data such as jobless claims and job‑opening levels have softened in recent weeks. None of these developments, taken alone, signal a break in the labor market’s broader resilience. Yet together they confirm a continuing shift from “slow hiring, no firing” to “no hiring, some firing.”

For the Federal Reserve, the timing is awkward. The labor market has been a stabilizing force even as inflation moves unevenly toward target. Now, with key data missing and secondary indicators showing mixed readings, the Fed’s wait‑and‑see stance becomes even more dependent on imperfect information. At the same time, markets continue to digest the implications of new Fed leadership.

For markets, the picture remains the same: crosscurrents, incomplete data, and a story still in the making.

The Week Ahead

The delayed employment and now inflation reports are the marquee economic goings next week, and even earnings reports lack the firepower we had the previous few weeks.

Better late than never

A partial government shutdown forced a halt to statistical work, so given the extension, the data will be released this week instead.

  • The non-farm payroll report will come out on Wednesday instead of this past Friday, though other private reports were out last week, and expectations for the report have not changed.
  • The Consumer Price Index (CPI) gets an extra two days.
  • Very little is expected to change in January from the December report.
  • After the previous shutdown from October to November, there is a sense of inconsistency in the data which has allowed inflation watchers to place slightly less emphasis on this report than in the past.

Lacking the sizzle

Earnings reports are still coming at a fast pace, but this week lacks the AI hype as names like Coca-Cola and McDonald’s are on the calendar.

  • The one “old tech” name that may be getting its day in the sun this week is Cisco Systems.
  • With all the investment in hardware to power AI that the Mag 7 are projecting some of that must be flowing to the maker of networking products.
  • Cisco stock is at an all-time high, finally above the pre-tech bubble levels going into the report.

International Flavor

A lower house election over the weekend in Japan and the United Kingdom’s 4th quarter Gross Domestic Product are what investors are watching, but sports fans will focus on the winter Olympics in Italy.

  • 116 Gold metals will be distributed across 16 different sports in the next 2 weeks.
  • USA, Norway, and Germany are historically the heavy hitters when it comes to gold medal count.

About Strategic

Founded in 1979, Strategic is a leading investment and wealth management firm managing and advising on total client assets of over $2.5 billion.

Overview

Disclosures

Strategic Financial Services, Inc. is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an Investment Advisor. The term “registered” signifies compliance with regulatory requirements and does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

The information provided on our website, including weekly market commentaries, financial planning articles, and other educational resources, is intended solely for educational purposes. It is designed to offer insights into financial planning and investment management, aiming to enhance understanding of financial concepts, strategies, and market trends. This content should not be interpreted as personalized investment advice or a recommendation for any specific strategy, financial planning approach, or investment product. Financial decisions are deeply personal and should be made considering the individual’s specific circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance. We recommend consulting with a professional financial advisor for personalized advice.

Please be aware that Strategic Financial Services, Inc. does not provide legal or tax advice. The content on this website is not intended to be used as such or as a substitute for legal or tax advice from a licensed professional. We advise seeking guidance from qualified legal and tax advisors regarding these matters.
Investment Risks and Portfolio Management.

The discussion of any investments on this website is for illustrative purposes only and provides no guarantee that the advisor will make any investments with the same or similar characteristics as those presented. The investments identified and described herein do not represent all the investments purchased or sold for client accounts. The selection of representative investments to discuss is based on various factors, including recent company news or earnings releases.

It should not be assumed that any investments discussed were or will be profitable. All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal. There is no assurance that investments mentioned will remain in client accounts at the time you view this information.

When index returns are mentioned on this site, they are provided as a general indicator of market conditions and are not representative of any client’s portfolio performance. Indices are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly. Therefore, their performance does not reflect the expenses associated with the management of an actual portfolio.

While index returns are used as a framework to report on general market conditions, they should not be construed as an indicator of future performance of any specific investment or portfolio. Discussion of index returns is intended to provide context and insight, not to suggest that clients will achieve similar results. Each client’s portfolio is managed according to their specific investment goals and financial situation.

The opinions and any forward-looking statements expressed in the articles and videos featured in our resource center are as of the date of publication. These statements are based on current laws, regulations, market conditions, and other relevant factors, including third-party data. Given the dynamic nature of financial and regulatory environments, as well as potential changes in market conditions or economic circumstances, the information provided may become outdated or may no longer be accurate.
We rely on third-party data to form our opinions and projections, which means that these are subject to the same uncertainties that affect all data-dependent analyses. As such, we advise readers to exercise caution and not rely solely on the statements made herein for making financial decisions. It is recommended that investors consult with a professional advisor who can help assess the relevance and accuracy of the content in light of the current economic climate and personal financial situation.

Our website contains links to third-party websites as a convenience to our users. Strategic Financial Services, Inc. does not control, endorse, or guarantee the content found on such sites. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of the external site or for that of subsequent links.
Contact the external site for answers to questions regarding its content.
The inclusion of any link does not imply our endorsement of the site, nor does it imply any association with its operators. Use of any such linked website is at the user’s own risk.

Related Resources