Skip to content
Resources/Weekly Insights
Subscribe
Volume 13, Edition 32 | November 30 - December 6, 2024

Expenses: The More You Pay the Less You Get

Doug Walters, CFA
This week we continue our focus on our Guiding Principles with a deep dive into Expenses which can be a hidden drag on performance over time.
findthemoney

Contributed by Doug Walters, David Lemire, Max Berkovich

You get what you pay for. So goes the saying. But in the world of investing that phrase takes on new meaning, where paying more may mean getting less. For this reason, we have made Expenses one of our Guiding Principles. It seems logical to minimize fees, but the choice is a little more nuanced than that. And before you can start that process, you first need to find those, sometimes, hidden fees that are a drag on your portfolio performance.

Why Hidden Fees Matter

Whether you are buying an ETF, mutual fund, or private investment, there are fees. You may not see them, but they are there. Afterall, the issuer and manager of the fund needs to get paid somehow. For funds, they usually come in the form of an “expense ratio.” This is a percent fee deducted directly from the performance of the fund. For example, if the investments within a fund were up 10% in a given year, and the fund had a 50 basis point (ie. 0.5%) expense ratio, your return would be 9.5%. You never directly see the fee, which is why we refer to it as hidden.

Fees can be low, like 3bps, or very high, like 150bps or more. Many studies have been done on these fees. In a 2016 report by Morningstar1, they looked at the universe of mutual funds and calculated what percentage of them both survived and outperformed their category group. They compared those results across different expense ratios. The 20% of funds with the lowest fees had a 62% success ratio. The 20% with the highest fees had only a 20% success ratio. So, in a way, you get what you pay for. The less you pay, the more you get!

Sometimes you can reduce fees without changing funds. We are always on the lookout for these share class exchange opportunities for our clients. The same fund can come in different “classes” and these classes can have different expenses. Perhaps you rolled over funds from a 401(k) to an IRA. You may have only had access to one fund class in the 401(k) and now have access to a cheaper one in your IRA. You can exchange it with no tax implications.

A Nuanced Decision

At Strategic, we keep costs in check for our clients, through the use of relatively low-cost ETFs. The embedded expense ratios across our suite of strategies range from just 5bps to 15bps. With that said, our goal is not simply to minimize the expense ratio. Rather it is to optimize the after-expense total return. We are more than willing to pay a little more expense, for the expectation of higher returns.

The multifactor funds we use at the core of our portfolios are a good example. Academic research shows that “factors” like High Quality, Good Value, Price Momentum and Small Size tend to outperform over time. While there is no guarantee that this trend will continue in the future, we find the academic research compelling and are willing to accept a few more basis points of expense to own these funds.

Expense Reductions in 2024

Our strategies started 2024 a bit more expensive than they are going to end the year. Part of that reduction has come from action we have taken to exit our core fixed income holding (at 20bps) in favor of funds with an expense of 4bps. Our goal here was in part tactical, but in part to reduce an expense that we determined was not likely to be justified going forward.

A few basis points here or there in expense may not seem like much, but it can add up over time, particularly as returns compound. Each of our Guiding Principles attempts to find these opportunities to potentially tip the performance scales in our clients’ favor. Next week we discuss Taxes.

1. Morningstar, “Predictive Power of Fees: Why Mutual Fund Fees Are So Important”, May 2016

Our Guiding Principles

62%

Success ratio of mutual funds with the lowest embedded fees

Morningstar found1 that the cheapest 20% of funds survived and outperformed 62% of the time. The 20% with the highest fees had only a 20% success ratio.

Headline of the Week

227,000

No that’s not bitcoin’s price, at least not yet. This month’s job number got back on track relative to last month’s mildly disappointing number. Granted last month had a fair amount of noise in the data due to hurricanes and a Boeing strike. The report reestablished the hypothesis that the employment picture remains solid but is gradually softening. It also reinforced expectations for another Fed rate cut in a few weeks. The “Goldilocks” and/or “Soft Landing” stories remain intact with the path forward remaining challenging. Immigration seems a likely source for future “Headlines of the Week”, but we’ll wait to see how this potent issue impacts jobs as well as wage pressures in the new year.

The Week Ahead

The week before the final Federal Reserve meeting of the year. We get an inflation report and several rate decisions abroad to digest. The wild card could be an economic conference in China.

Consistent and Persistent

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) next week will offer a final look at inflation before the Federal Reserve assembles to make its final rate decision for 2024.

  • The past several inflation reports have come in-line with expectations, and we expect the same this time.
  • Expectations are that the CPI headline number will be another 0.2% monthly increase in inflation and the November-to-November inflation will be 2.7%.
  • Core-CPI, which excludes food and energy, is expected to be up 0.3% for the month and 3.3% year over year.

Cut It Out!

It is a full house for central banks waiting to cut rates next week.

  • Australia, Switzerland, Brazil, and Canada have rate meetings, but the biggest will be the European Central Bank (ECB).
  • Australia has a persistent inflation and a sputtering economy, with the double whammy, the odds say they will hold rates steady.
  • The Swiss National Bank on the other hand has sub-1% inflation, and markets are expecting a ½ a percent trim.
  • Canada is expected to keep the cut small at ¼ of a percent.
  • Brazil is speculated to be cutting by ¾ of a percent, this is after 2 rate hikes that brought the short rate to 11.25%.
  • The ECB has had a major member nation’s administration collapse and another on the cusp, with all the headwinds from political crisis’s economic sentiment has been dealt a blow.
  • While a ½ percent cut might help, current expectations are for a fourth ¼ of a percent move.

No Numbers

The Central Economic Work Conference in China is different than the two-session gatherings we usually hear about.

  • No numbers or targets get released; however, this will offer a window into what the central planners will target and prioritize in the new year.
  • The tone and change in language will hint to investors how the Chinese government will try to institute the long-awaited intervention to boost the economy, if at all.

About Strategic

Founded in 1979, Strategic is a leading investment and wealth management firm managing and advising on total client assets of over $2 billion.

Overview

Disclosures

Strategic Financial Services, Inc. is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an Investment Advisor. The term “registered” signifies compliance with regulatory requirements and does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

The information provided on our website, including weekly market commentaries, financial planning articles, and other educational resources, is intended solely for educational purposes. It is designed to offer insights into financial planning and investment management, aiming to enhance understanding of financial concepts, strategies, and market trends. This content should not be interpreted as personalized investment advice or a recommendation for any specific strategy, financial planning approach, or investment product. Financial decisions are deeply personal and should be made considering the individual’s specific circumstances, goals, and risk tolerance. We recommend consulting with a professional financial advisor for personalized advice.

Please be aware that Strategic Financial Services, Inc. does not provide legal or tax advice. The content on this website is not intended to be used as such or as a substitute for legal or tax advice from a licensed professional. We advise seeking guidance from qualified legal and tax advisors regarding these matters.
Investment Risks and Portfolio Management.

The discussion of any investments on this website is for illustrative purposes only and provides no guarantee that the advisor will make any investments with the same or similar characteristics as those presented. The investments identified and described herein do not represent all the investments purchased or sold for client accounts. The selection of representative investments to discuss is based on various factors, including recent company news or earnings releases.

It should not be assumed that any investments discussed were or will be profitable. All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal. There is no assurance that investments mentioned will remain in client accounts at the time you view this information.

When index returns are mentioned on this site, they are provided as a general indicator of market conditions and are not representative of any client’s portfolio performance. Indices are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly. Therefore, their performance does not reflect the expenses associated with the management of an actual portfolio.

While index returns are used as a framework to report on general market conditions, they should not be construed as an indicator of future performance of any specific investment or portfolio. Discussion of index returns is intended to provide context and insight, not to suggest that clients will achieve similar results. Each client’s portfolio is managed according to their specific investment goals and financial situation.

The opinions and any forward-looking statements expressed in the articles and videos featured in our resource center are as of the date of publication. These statements are based on current laws, regulations, market conditions, and other relevant factors, including third-party data. Given the dynamic nature of financial and regulatory environments, as well as potential changes in market conditions or economic circumstances, the information provided may become outdated or may no longer be accurate.
We rely on third-party data to form our opinions and projections, which means that these are subject to the same uncertainties that affect all data-dependent analyses. As such, we advise readers to exercise caution and not rely solely on the statements made herein for making financial decisions. It is recommended that investors consult with a professional advisor who can help assess the relevance and accuracy of the content in light of the current economic climate and personal financial situation.

Our website contains links to third-party websites as a convenience to our users. Strategic Financial Services, Inc. does not control, endorse, or guarantee the content found on such sites. We are not responsible for the accuracy, legality, or content of the external site or for that of subsequent links.
Contact the external site for answers to questions regarding its content.
The inclusion of any link does not imply our endorsement of the site, nor does it imply any association with its operators. Use of any such linked website is at the user’s own risk.

Related Resources